Comments on: Interview: Timothy Heath on the South China Sea Dispute https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/ Military, Politics, Economy, Energy Security, Environment, Commodities Geopolitical Analysis & Forecasting Thu, 05 Apr 2018 20:47:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.14 By: T vannieKaap https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2367 Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:17:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2367 In reply to Exitus Caeli.

Nothing trendy about it – when I look at the long list of American invasions and regime changes, at the multi-national disasters they left behind in Indo-China and now in North Africa and the Middle East I realize that the Americans are not in Chinese waters for world peace. I wait for the day the Chinese and the Russians start playing in the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico.

]]>
By: Exitus Caeli https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2366 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:45:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2366 In reply to T vannieKaap.

And of course, the Chinese motives for wanting to control a body of water that provide the sole source of harbors for several Asian nations (that they are already directly threatening) and moving to do so with military buildups and threats to all nations in the area is somehow “American wickedness”?.

Beating a social drum that’s trendy with your local peers isn’t the same as objectively assessing genuine threats. A knee-jerk equivalence of “the U.S. motive is always bad” disavows the reality of the world and a great number of things the U.S. has done in it.

If you think China is a more noble and trustworthy nation to lean on, I’d invite you to revisit that imagining say, fifteen years from now.

]]>
By: T vannieKaap https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2365 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:17:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2365 In reply to bruce shand.

Yep, like always. Brave Americans, wicked Chinese.

]]>
By: BruceEWoych https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2363 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:15:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2363 http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2016/05/rodrigo-duterte-era-philippines-160511101236269.html
Rodrigo Duterte: A new era in the Philippines
By Richard Javad Heydarian
“A new era awaits the Philippines, but no one knows for sure whether it is for better or worse.”

]]>
By: T vannieKaap https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2364 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:15:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2364 He sounds very like a US Government spokesman. He’s not independent, that’s for sure.

]]>
By: DriverRob https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2362 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:11:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2362 The author discusses the South China Sea issue as if he decides US interests and policies. The US people are not prepared to fight the Chinese over this sea lane and fishing area so suggesting we would defend the area as China builds its control over it are pipe dreams. He then relates China’s policies and activities only in the short term. China thinks long-term. Everything else is play-acting and psychological warfare in service of its long term goals. If indeed obtaining control of everything within the nine-dash line is a core interest of China, they will do whatever is necessary, whether it is hard or easy, and whether it takes one year or 50 years. The US thinks short term and operates short term. China bides its time, knowing this. Over time, Beijing expects the we will become too overstretched militarily and too weak economically to defend and police the zone. Over time, the Chinese leaders expect it will fall like a ripe apple into their arms without any significant fighting. Giving arms to Vietnam or the Phillipines won’t help because those countries have to be able to use them effectively and have the will to fight. Both are lacking. The US needs a long-term strategy for this problem and some real thought to arrive at an effective policy that meets the needs of everyone.

]]>
By: BruceEWoych https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2361 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:55:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2361 The “TRUMP” CARD in the South China Sea
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2016/06/dawn-philippine-china-relations-duterte-160604101429033.html

New dawn for Philippine-China relations?
By

Richard Javad Heydarian

]]>
By: bruce shand https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/interview-timothy-heath-on-the-south-china-sea-dispute/#comment-2360 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:24:00 +0000 https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/?p=29033#comment-2360 No bias here: The U.S. is just interested in peace, freedom, and stability. China has emerging selfish interests and wants to assert control.

]]>